This afternoon, Facebook and Twitter have been alive with reports of the city shutting down the Art House at 1614 Esplanade Ave. and attempting to evict its residents. The spectacle of the Art House’s Facebook page is an awkward one as everybody’s up in arms and saying what should and shouldn’t happen despite a an almost complete lack of legal knowledge (judging by the posts). Gambit’s Alejandro de los Rios must have slept through the Nagin years when he wrote, ”Chalk this up as one of the absolute worst decisions made by a city government in, well, ever.”
One person that I assume is a resident writes, “The city of NOLA just took a big bite out of its own culture”. On it’s face, that’s a lot of hype unless they’re hiding spy boys or clarinet players in the tree, but it’s not way far off. Given the importance of freaks and heads to the popularizing of New Orleans’ street music culture, counterculture enterprises are a valuable, overlooked part of the city’s history.
You’d think this is a case of The Man busting the poor, innocent little guy judging by the Facebook page. “This place was just beautiful,” one person wrote (verbatim, errors preserved). “This is the house of the rising sun, its more than just a venue for parties, its a historical and cultural landmark. we cannot let hm to do this to the house and the wonderful people who live there.” But the Treme neighborhood association told its members to call NOPD “to report an infraction, i.e. loud music, open fights, excessive trash thrown on street and/or neutral ground, damage to proporty of residents or vehicles in neighborhood.” Funny how really cool parties aren’t always really cool for the neighbors and one man’s treasure’s another’s nuisance.
All the overheated drama of youth aside, if the residents are being run out today without a chance to find new living quarters, that’s morally if not legally wrong (I know I’m not a lawyer and won’t speculate). Unfortunately, the story emphasizes the degree to which city government protects itself first, property values second, everything else third. The same dynamic that was at play in regards to the Mid-City Bonfire is manifested here. An underground phenomenon that existed outside of conventional capitalist forces bubbled up into the city’s consciousness (in this case, due to the Gambit cover story) and forced the city to deal with it. Like the bonfire, the issues connected to the house are real in one sense but overrated in others. At the bonfire, for instance, the chances of someone getting hurt were real, but in over a decade of going to the bonfire, I never saw anyone hurt. Similarly, drinking in a tree 50 feet off the ground sounds risky, but if partygoers weren’t surviving that, the parties would have ended or changed.
New Orleans (and to be fair, most cities, I suspect) doesn’t handle things that don’t fit neatly in a priority system that doesn’t put property values and money at the top. An arts collective certainly fits that bill, particularly one with social and aesthetic underpinnings borne out of rave and DJ culture. When in doubt, it will always side with homeowners against art expressions that aren’t easily commodified and the non-conformists who make them. And if the residents and partygoers are honest, they’d admit that the outside-the-law dimension was part of the buzz.
Really, the biggest mystery connected to the Art House raid is the seeming surprise that everyone has that they were raided. A proposed three-day festival for this weekend was nixed by the city, so the Art House tried to replace it with a one-night benefit-which would still amount to a smaller version of the thing the city already said no to. Like the Mid-City Bonfire, everyone who went to the Art House and visited it had to know that the days of such an unconventional space are numbered. Really, the success of the Art House is that it ever happened at all. That’s cold comfort when you’re facing eviction, but anybody who thought they’d grow old there was delusional.




But why SHOULD they, or any other similar thing, ever be shut down? It shouldn't be that way.
I completely agree, I was a fan of the art house, at least the work. However when I asked tough questions regarding the legalities in this situation (via facebook) I was personally attacked. I only asked to try and help with a solution (volunteers to bring house to code). I personally believe that attack (s) on my character are just another symptom of a larger problem plaguing the Art House…adults displaying childlike behavior and not expecting the rules of society apply to them. The fact is this, everyone lives with “codes”, rules etc. They are not immune. Any House…art or no art. I hope the spirit of creation continues in a legal and respectful manner.
I'm just surprised that the police force ACTUALLY showed up to such a small problem in a city with such vast issues. Not too long ago I visited the great city of New Orleans to have mine and several travel companions' cars' broken into and vandalized. Four hour after our initial call to the police department one officer shows up. Maybe they were busy shutting down some other magical . Glad this city has their priorities . It is just really sad.
try living in the house next store when you have to go to work at 6am!
After I saw the Gambit story and the advertisements for the 3-day party, I knew they were in trouble. I'm all about having an artists' residence and think the concept is cool — but who in their right mind would think that a 3-day party/festival/concert was going to fly, especially on Esplanade Avenue?!
Methinks they got a little greedy and certainly disrespectful to their neighbors. Again, I support the collective wholeheartedly, but they were flat-out stupid to plan and advertise their festival.
The people in that neighborhood have the right to have peace and quiet and not have trash strewn about their streets.
They aren't being forced out because they're freaks or artists. They're being forced out because they are terrible neighbors!
The Art House would not have this problem if they'd respected the people who live around them.
To MD: We all live in contexts – socially, aesthetically, politically and physically, and if we choose to ignore or confront them, we have to be ready for the pushback. That life-as-confrontation idea is so hard-wired into alternative living arrangements and spaces that it goes without saying, and anyone living or partying there who won't cop to the low level buzz that accompanies living and playing outside of societal norms is dishonest or naive. And before you say how things should and shouldn't be, consider the thing you consider most obnoxious and/or hateful and ask if it's equally cool for that to be next door to you? Should everybody be able to do what they want, or just the people who share your values?
Part of the beauty and marvel of extreme things like the Art House and the Mid-City Bonfire are that they ever existed, and each return to them was a cause for celebration that another outpost for over-the-top creativity survived another day, month or year. But such things aren't made to live long; their extreme natures almost guarantees their before-their-time demise.
There's a “Save the Treehouse” Web site at http://savethetreehouse.wordpress.com/ for those who wish to show support.
[...] rest is here: Oh, the Rhetoric! :: offBeat :: Louisiana and New Orleans Online … Share and [...]
[...] more here: Oh, the Rhetoric! :: offBeat :: Louisiana and New Orleans Online … Share and [...]